Internal tools and workflows
The work that never reaches the top of the backlog because it only affects one team.
- Approval flows
- Admin panels
- Operations dashboards
- Reporting
Describe what your team needs. Avokaido builds it in your approved frameworks, inside the guardrails your platform and security teams set once, and opens a pull request in your own repository.
Request
Build an internal approval dashboard for expense reports, with role-based sign-off and an audit trail.
Building
Move from first version to something a customer can depend on.
Ship quickly under isolation, access and audit requirements you already have.
Bring an AI-generated prototype into a repository your engineers can review and own.
The same path every time, whether the request comes from an engineer or from the person who actually has the problem.
Someone describes what the team needs, in plain language.
Avokaido writes it using the frameworks and patterns you approve.
Your access rules, isolation and quality gates are applied as it builds.
Tests are generated and run before anything leaves the platform.
A pull request lands in your repository for your team to review.
The person closest to a problem is rarely the person with room on the roadmap. Avokaido closes that gap without moving control out of engineering.
Operations, finance, support and product people request real applications in plain language. No ticket, no queue, no translating the requirement for someone else to interpret.
Approved frameworks, security level, tenant isolation, quality gates, audit trail and the repository every result lands in. Configured once, applied to every build that follows.
IT stops being the bottleneck without becoming the owner of work it never saw.
The interface is the part everyone reviews. Underneath it sit the logic and the data, and that is usually where quality quietly gives way.
Avokaido builds through all three layers, and keeps checking them after release.
See what is insideReal applications in your own stack, on your own domain, in your own repositories.
The work that never reaches the top of the backlog because it only affects one team.
Production software on your own domain, with isolation and access control from the first commit.
Connective work across systems you already run, instead of another manual process.
Avokaido builds inside the tools your team runs today. Nothing here asks you to migrate first.
Building quickly only helps if quality stays visible afterwards. Avokaido scans each repository weekly and reports what changed underneath.
Up 6 points since the service was generated.
Untested paths
PaymentRetryService.retry()ApprovalRules.escalate()Complexity hotspot
ReportBuilder.compose() quadratic, trending up Security is not a tier you upgrade into. Your platform and security teams set the guardrails once, and every application the business builds after that inherits them.
Seat-based tools make collaboration expensive. Building it in-house is slow. The trade-off is not actually necessary.
| Dimension | Avokaido | Seat-based AI tools | Build in-house |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 10% on token spend | Per-seat licences plus usage tiers | Salaries plus infrastructure |
| Cost as the team grows | Invite everyone, no per-seat cost | Every seat adds to the bill | Every hire adds to the bill |
| Time to first app | Minutes | Days to onboard | Months |
| AI models | Bring your own Claude, GPT and Gemini | Usually one vendor model | Your integration to maintain |
| Code ownership | Your repositories, no lock-in | Often locked to the vendor | Yours |
| Security and governance | You set the level: isolation, audit, GDPR | Vendor-defined | Built in-house, slowly |
| Ongoing quality | Weekly repository monitoring included | An add-on, or nothing | Build it yourself |
You pay your AI provider for what you use, and Avokaido adds a single percentage on top. Repository monitoring is billed separately, per repository.
Our domain experts ship the tools they used to wait two quarters for, and everything still lands in our GitHub, inside the guardrails we set.
Bring-your-own-keys plus a flat 10% made the budget conversation trivial. No seats to negotiate, no tier to outgrow.
The weekly repository monitoring caught coverage gaps and complexity creep before they ever reached production.
You bring your own AI provider keys and pay those providers directly for tokens. Avokaido adds a flat 10% on that token spend. There are no seat licences, no usage tiers and no platform fee. Repository monitoring is billed separately at a per-repository monthly rate.
Yes. Plug in your own Claude, OpenAI and Gemini keys. The provider bills you directly for usage, so you keep full control of spend and the commercial relationship. We never resell tokens.
In your own repositories on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. Everything Avokaido builds is pushed to your version control, so there is no lock-in. If you leave, you keep every line.
No. Your code, prompts and data are never used to train any model, ours or a provider’s. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and each workspace is tenant-isolated.
You set the security level. Tenant isolation, role-based access, audit logging, SSO/SAML and GDPR-ready data handling are built in, with a self-hosted option for stricter policies. SOC 2 Type II is in progress and ISO 27001 is planned.
No. You can self-serve and create a workspace in minutes with GitHub, Google, Microsoft or Apple. If you would rather see it on your own stack first, you can book a demo and we will walk you through it.
Internal tools and workflows, customer-facing apps on your own domain, and automations that connect the systems you already run. Across Java, .NET, Python, Go, Rust, React, Angular, Vue, Flutter and more.
No sales call required. Most teams have a workspace running in a few minutes.
Dedicated onboarding and hands-on support are part of the platform, not an upgrade.
A 30-minute walkthrough on your own use case, with a security and governance review for your team.
Request received.
We will be in touch within one business day.